A valid Initial reaction:
An expected and valid initial reaction to this work will be that this in no way proves that atoms in our universe are like the simplistic atoms in this metric-space ‘toy’ universe. This is true, but it also misses other truths of this work that can stimulate a refreshing renewal of thought about us and the nature of our universe.
These pictures remind me of cold season of this work when I was still trapped in thinking about behavior through the lens of vector-space mathematics. It was almost exactly one year after an up-close encounter with this mountain lion (2010) that a thread of insight came up from within (another dream) and opened a pathway to an alternative landscape of thought seen through a different Pythagorean / Cartesian lens.
A truth demonstrated in this story is that the five missing technical constructs described in this work stand on their own and are not included in the contemporary teachings of physics and applied mathematics. Another is that the dynamic geometric metric-space derived here - when labeled with the terms of physics and calibrated to the speed of light and the age of our universe - demonstrates astonishing and compelling alignment with the behavior of light, energy, and relativity in our actual universe.
Go to next page: Is Spacetime actually flawed?